Dear All,

We were and are always at the receiving end in most of our QA meeting by Saba Sir's critics. Initially these critics always blocked us from going further and thoughts like "are we in the right path of testing", "what are we contributing to Quality", "Better to change the field" etc etc popped up. Better late than never, realized the importance of his opposing act on our thoughts, which is really refining our mindsets to form us as "Effective Testing Team".

History says testing concept was initiated by Scientists. There were controversies on the individual’s approach but then controversies led them to think better. One of the Scientists proposed Experimental Approach; other opposed the approach as he didn’t believe that they presented conclusive evidence of anything, thinking that devices used is unreliable. One more says that experimental approach always couldn’t produce Universal Knowledge, as the same experiment gave different results. So the “knowledge” that you create isn’t forever and always. Experimental knowledge is always provisional.